Tribe official says council will consider treaty pullout
Mike Nowatzki, The Forum
Published Thursday, December 27, 2007
Avis Little Eagle says she understands the frustration that led Lakota activists to announce a plan to withdraw from the tribe’s treaties with the U.S. government.
However, the vice chairwoman of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Council advocates holding the federal government to the provisions in those treaties, rather than withdrawing from them.
“I see where they’re coming from,” she said of American Indian Movement leader Russell Means and other members of the Lakota Freedom Delegation who declared the Lakota people’s independence to the State Department last week in Washington, D.C.
“But we, as elected officials, on a daily basis we refer to those treaties because to us they are living documents,” Little Eagle said Wednesday from the tribe’s headquarters in Fort Yates, N.D.
Little Eagle said council members will probably discuss the delegation’s letter, “and I can’t say what action they will take.”
Graphic: Map
RELATED CONTENT
Mike Nowatzki Archive
Duane Martin Sr., a delegation member and leader of the Strongheart Civil Rights Movement, said Wednesday that the State Department had yet to respond to the notice of withdrawal from the treaties.
“We are anxious that they will (respond). We’ve got other nations looking at us in a positive venue,” he said, noting that the delegation has sought recognition of sovereignty from Bolivia, Chile and South Africa, among others.
In its notice, the delegation claims that the United States’ continuing violation of treaties, including the Treaty of 1851 and the Treaty of 1868 at Fort Laramie, “have resulted in the near annihilation of our people physically, spiritually and culturally.”
If the federal government doesn’t recognize the tribe’s independence, Lakota people will file liens on land in the five-state treaty area, which includes parts of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Nebraska and Wyoming, the letter of withdrawal says.
Means said members of the new Lakota nation wouldn’t pay taxes, and the new government would issue its own driver’s licenses and passports, the Sioux Falls (S.D.) Argus Leader reported. Non-Indians could still live in the new territory.
Little Eagle, a Hunkpapa Lakota, said many tribal governments are frustrated with a lack of federal support for health care, law enforcement and other provisions in treaties the U.S. government has failed to honor.
“If they bring attention to it, maybe it’ll be to the good,” she said.
She said she didn’t know about the delegation’s plans before the announcement.
Delegation members have made it clear that they don’t represent tribal governments, which are described on the group’s Web site as “beholden to the colonial apartheid system” and “ ‘stay by the fort’ Indians who are unwilling to claim their freedom.”
Martin said members spent 3½ years gathering input and support from tribal elders and others on the reservations before announcing the plan.
“They’re tired of this colonial oppression,” he said.
Readers can reach Forum reporter Mike Nowatzki at (701) 241-5528
Mike Nowatzki, The Forum
Published Thursday, December 27, 2007
Avis Little Eagle says she understands the frustration that led Lakota activists to announce a plan to withdraw from the tribe’s treaties with the U.S. government.
However, the vice chairwoman of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Council advocates holding the federal government to the provisions in those treaties, rather than withdrawing from them.
“I see where they’re coming from,” she said of American Indian Movement leader Russell Means and other members of the Lakota Freedom Delegation who declared the Lakota people’s independence to the State Department last week in Washington, D.C.
“But we, as elected officials, on a daily basis we refer to those treaties because to us they are living documents,” Little Eagle said Wednesday from the tribe’s headquarters in Fort Yates, N.D.
Little Eagle said council members will probably discuss the delegation’s letter, “and I can’t say what action they will take.”
Graphic: Map
RELATED CONTENT
Mike Nowatzki Archive
Duane Martin Sr., a delegation member and leader of the Strongheart Civil Rights Movement, said Wednesday that the State Department had yet to respond to the notice of withdrawal from the treaties.
“We are anxious that they will (respond). We’ve got other nations looking at us in a positive venue,” he said, noting that the delegation has sought recognition of sovereignty from Bolivia, Chile and South Africa, among others.
In its notice, the delegation claims that the United States’ continuing violation of treaties, including the Treaty of 1851 and the Treaty of 1868 at Fort Laramie, “have resulted in the near annihilation of our people physically, spiritually and culturally.”
If the federal government doesn’t recognize the tribe’s independence, Lakota people will file liens on land in the five-state treaty area, which includes parts of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Nebraska and Wyoming, the letter of withdrawal says.
Means said members of the new Lakota nation wouldn’t pay taxes, and the new government would issue its own driver’s licenses and passports, the Sioux Falls (S.D.) Argus Leader reported. Non-Indians could still live in the new territory.
Little Eagle, a Hunkpapa Lakota, said many tribal governments are frustrated with a lack of federal support for health care, law enforcement and other provisions in treaties the U.S. government has failed to honor.
“If they bring attention to it, maybe it’ll be to the good,” she said.
She said she didn’t know about the delegation’s plans before the announcement.
Delegation members have made it clear that they don’t represent tribal governments, which are described on the group’s Web site as “beholden to the colonial apartheid system” and “ ‘stay by the fort’ Indians who are unwilling to claim their freedom.”
Martin said members spent 3½ years gathering input and support from tribal elders and others on the reservations before announcing the plan.
“They’re tired of this colonial oppression,” he said.
Readers can reach Forum reporter Mike Nowatzki at (701) 241-5528
posted by:
|
Massachusetts
|
